I was invited to write a guest post on the blog Killer Campaigning over the weekend.  I hope you’ll check it out and let me know what you think. Merry Christmas!

- Nathan

RunSmart2Win is developing a farm team of conservative elected officials, teaching future candidates how to win political races. RS2W will show candidates how to do it, demonstrating practicable strategies — taught by experts and insiders — that achieve winning results.

Would you would like to become a RunSmart2Win contributor, guest blogger, Twitter or Facebook evangelist?  Send us an email to learn more!

RunSmart2Win’s contributors have diverse backgrounds and life experiences, but a common love for conservative politics and the great state we call home: North Carolina.  Meet the team…

Jeff Tillman is the founder of RunSmart2Win, a blog focusing on the recruitment of highly qualified GOP candidates to run for office in North Carolina. Jeff has worked in the marketing/advertising field for more than a decade. He is an Appalachian State University alumnus and lives in the heart of Starmount Forest, one of the best little neighborhoods in Greensboro, NC, with his wife, three children, and a pretty good dog named Beaufort. You can follow Jeff on Twitter here: @GOP_NC.

Nathan Babcock is a missionary turned Republican mercenary. He and his wife, Amber, are returning to North Carolina after four years in Central America. Nathan will work for a political fundraising firm, Harrington Forward Thinking, and the Institute of Political Leadership as a Spring 2010 Fellow. His moonlighting job is helping Republicans win elections by building online communities tied to grassroots movements. He is a Charlotte native and graduated from UNC. Nathan and Amber are in the process of adopting a child from Nicaragua. Nathan tweets here: @NathanBabcock.

Abigail (Abby) Alger works for the Leadership Institute, an Arlington, VA-based organization which identifies, recruits, trains, and places conservatives within the public policy process. She is keenly interested in any combination of politics, policy, and web technology — especially as it relates to government transparency and political strategy. A Duke University graduate and reformed northerner, her heart — and, eventually, her home — are in great state of North Carolina. Aside from visiting North Carolina as often as possible, she enjoys horseback riding, following horse racing, and training to be a classic movie buff. You can follow Abby on Twitter here: @AbbyAlger.

Someone plugged this redistricting app — giving users the chance to map Congressional Districts, state by state, based on 2010 population projections — and I haven’t gotten anything accomplished since! Warning: before you try it out, plan on wasting at least a couple of hours.

After playing around with how North Carolina would look with 14 Congressional Districts (which appears unlikely in this census) and writing hidden messages in the multi-colored hodgepodge of 3,000 or so precincts, I decided to take a stab at what the state could look like after the 2010 Census. Now, I realize that redistricting is largely a political exercise — with politicians and party bosses choosing their voters. But there are constraints to what the map makers can do (population constraints, rules about when districts can be drawn to cross county lines and when they can’t, etc.). So, unless legislators tear up the old map and start over (which probably wouldn’t be that bad of an idea), this is what North Carolina’s Congressional Districts could look like from 2012 to 2020. If I were a betting man, I’d put money on the map looking something like this…although I would not bet the farm on it!

First, here is a “before and after” picture of North Carolina’s 13 Congressional Districts followed by my observations on which districts change the most and the least. (Note: I flipped the colors around slightly to make CD-12 visible to the naked eye.)

Observations: did the districts shrink, expand, shift, or stay the same?

1. CD-1 Expands - The 1st District gains precincts in Granville County from the 13th District and gains all of southern Vance County, northern Franklin County, and northern Nash County from the 2nd District. The demographic make-up of the 1st District does not change much. Remains Safe Democrat.
2. CD-2 Shrinks and Shifts - The 2nd Districts loses a lot of Eastern NC territory to the 1st District, plus all of eastern and southern Sampson County to the 3rd District (the “green arrow” becoming the “purple arrow” in the pictures above). The 2nd District also gains several densely populated precincts in Wake County from the 4th District in exchange for a low-density precinct in Chatham County. The 2nd District undergos the most dramatic changes of all of the 13 districts, becoming less rural and much more urban and suburban. The 2nd will become the “Triangle Exurbs” district. Goes from Safe Democrat to Battleground (only when Bob Etheridge retires).
3. CD-3 Expands - The 2nd District’s loss is the 3rd District’s gain: southeast Sampson County and several Nash County precincts will change hands. Geographically, the 3rd District picks up a lot of new territory. But demographically, the change is slight. This will remain a mostly rural, coastal district. Remains Safe Republican.
4. CD-4 Shrinks - The Research Triangle area, and Wake County in particular, is experiencing unprecedented growth. This will cause the 4th District to shed some of its Wake County precincts to the 2nd and 13th Districts. The make-up of the district will not change dramatically, becoming a slightly less urban and slightly more suburban and exurban. Remains Safe Democrat.
5. CD-5 Expands - The 5th District will pick up a lot of territory, gaining the northwest corner of Guilford County from the 6th District, several urban precincts around Greensboro and Winston-Salem from the 12th District, and a few rural precincts from the 13th District in Rockingham County. The 5th also swaps one county for another with the 10th District: Alexander County for Avery County. This probably does not pose any major changes for the district: it picks up some “liberal” urban precincts, but some “conservative” rural and suburban ones as well. Remains Safe Republican.
6. CD-6 Shrinks - It’s not a major change, but the 6th District will lose its northwest corner of Guilford County to the 5th District.  Other than that, the 6th stays exactly the same.  It will remain the conservative core of North Carolina’s Piedmont. Remains Safe Republican.
7. CD-7 Remains the Same - No changes whatsoever in the 7th District. While Wilmington is experiencing a lot of growth, the rest of the region is becoming less populated. The effect on CD-7? It stays exactly the same. Goes from Safe Democrat to Battleground (only when Mike McIntyre retires).
8. CD-8 Remains the Same - The theory is (which I read here), the 8th District will have to expand into the Charlotte suburbs to account for the rapid growth in the area and the 9th District’s need to shed about 70,000 voters. But I don’t think that’s going to happen. Here’s why: the 10th District is “land-locked” between two districts that haven’t grown very much as compared to the rest of the state (the 11th and 5th Districts). Therefore, the 10th District will have to expand south and east into the Charlotte suburbs, taking densely populated Gaston County precincts away from the 9th District.  With the 9th District shedding voters in Gaston, it’s going to remain virtually unchanged in Mecklenburg and Union counties. And if the 9th District holds on to most of its precincts east and south of Charlotte, the 8th District will remain unaffected. My map above bears this out. Remains Democrat-Leaning.
9. CD-9 Shrinks - As I write above, the 9th District will lose precincts to the 10th District in Gaston County. But I predict that the 9th will retain all or most of its Mecklenburg and Union County precincts. The demographics probably won’t be affected by the loss of some Gaston County precincts, but the overall district is trending more towards the Democrats’ favor as Charlotte has become more liberal over the decades. I’m not predicting the 9th District will be a battleground district anytime soon, but the GOP should definitely keep its eye on the trend line. Goes from Safe Republican to Republican-Leaning (only when Sue Myrick retires).
10. CD-10 Shifts - I wrote that the 2nd District will have the most dramatic changes after 2010. The 10th District probably comes in at number two. First, I predict that the 10th and 5th will swap Avery and Alexander counties. Second, as I state above, geography dictates that the 10th District expand into Gaston County, picking up tens of thousands of voters from the 9th District. Third, the 10th will lose voters in the north and west to compensate for the gains in Gaston; the 11th District will take Michell and most of western Rutherford County from the 10th. If my prediction turns out to be correct, the 10th will become the “Foothills and Charlotte Exurbs” district: less rural, more urban and suburban, and probably slightly less conservative (although it will probably remain one of the safest “red” districts in the state). Remains Safe Republican.
11. CD-11 Expands - At the expense of the 10th District, the 11th will pick up Michell and western Rutherford counties. These are largely rural, sparsely populated areas. The demographic affect will be slight, but the trend line will probably point slightly more conservative (solidifying the 11th District’s claim as one of the most competitive Congressional Districts in all of the South). Remains a Battleground.
12. CD-12 Shrinks - The amorphous blob that is the 12th Congressional District will probably remain about the same, hugging I-85 from Charlotte to Greensboro. There has been a lot of growth in the Triad and in Charlotte, but more in the suburban areas than urban ones. The 12th District is almost entirely urban. I predict that it will shrink slightly, losing precincts in Winston-Salem and Greensboro to the 5th District. Thus, the district will lose a few thousand African-American voters, becoming more conservative in the process, but it will remain 100 percent locked up for the Dems for eons. Remains Safe Democrat.
13. CD-13 Shifts - Like the 10th District, the 13th is land-locked with nowhere to grow but east (unless Virginia is willing to give North Carolina some land). The 13th will shed some precincts on its western flank in Rockingham County to the 5th District — and some precints on its eastern flank in Granville County to the 1st District — in order to expand into Wake County, relieving the 4th District from some of its most densely populated precincts. CD-13 was drawn to be a battleground district after the last census, but it didn’t turn out that way. It’s been a safe Democrat seat since its creation. And its shift out of parts of two rural counties, expanding more into Raleigh, probably makes it even safer for the Dems. Remains Safe Democrat.

That’s it!  There’s my long-winded explanation of a redistricting plan that may or may not happen as I predict.  If you have any thoughts, disagreements, or ammendments to “Nathan’s 2012 North Carolina Redistricting Plan,” please post a comment!

Yesterday I apologized for my long absence from the blog. Today I’m going to do something unheard of in the blogesphere: promote someone else’s blog!

While I’ve pledged to pick up the pace on RunSmart2Win once more — posting about once or twice a week — I know that this isn’t enough to satisfy some of the political campaign junkies out there. So, while I hope you’ll stick around (and subscribe to our RSS feed to make reading RunSmart2Win simpler and more convenient), I strongly suggest you check out Killer Campaigning for “daily non-partisan tips for campaign junkies.”

Here’s more on Killer Campaigning:

If you’re serious about getting the best advice on running a great political campaign, then this is the site you’ve been looking for. Whether you’re running a small local campaign or a barnstorming across a state, you’ll find plenty of common-sense tips and little-known political secrets on Killer Campaigning.

The campaign tips we share on Killer Campaigning aren’t just guesswork.  These are field-tested strategies that we’ve used on numerous local, state and national campaigns . . . strategies that work.

We don’t care if you’re a Democrat, Republican, Independent or Martian . . . our advice is for everyone.  You won’t find political posturing here at Killer Campaigning, just solid campaign advice.

I want to apologize for not updating the blog in recent months. This has been an extremely busy time for me. As we bloggers like to say: “Life keeps getting in the way of my blog.” But I’m happy to announce that RunSmart2Win.com will pick up where it left off: providing campaign tips, do’s and don’t’s, and the latest news on the North Carolina political scene. I’ll start with the unambitious goal of posting one update per week — and more when time allows.

If you would like to help out — and ensure more frequent entries on RunSmart2Win — take a stab at contributing on the site!  Contact me for more details.

Again, our apologies for neglecting the blog. Our inattention does not reflect our gratitude towards our readers or our passion for the subject matter discussed here!

Here are a few thoughts on the election results — and some lessons for activists, potential candidates, politics junkies and insiders:

1. It’s still the economy, stupid. The results in New Jersey, Virginia, and elsewhere prove that voters — above everything else — still vote their wallets and pocketbooks. Cultural issues were far less important (see Virginia), and Independents don’t put a lot of stock in personal attacks (Virginia and New Jersey) or endorsements (Virginia, New Jersey, and upstate New York). Exit polls revealed that 20 percent of New Jersey voters and 37 percent of Virginia voters (according to one poll) said the economy and jobs were the number one factor in whom they voted for. My guess: an overwhelming majority would rate the economy and jobs as one of their top three issues. Campaigns that focus on lowering taxes, cutting spending, improving economic and business conditions, and creating jobs will be the winning campaigns of 2010.
2. Incumbents beware. There was a general “Throw the bums out!” atmosphere during this year’s election (especially in New Jersey). If the economy remains on life support through 2010, that feeling will be even more palpable next November, to the benefit of challengers nationwide. With big majorities in the Senate, House, governor’s mansions and state houses across the country, the Democrats should be afraid. Very afraid. I would add that “Blue Dog Democrats” should also be afraid. Creigh Deeds was trying to become the third Blue Dog in a row to win the governor’s race in the “purple” state of Virginia. He lost by 18 points. Methinks his landslide loss will terrify moderate Democrats weighing the decision to vote for Pelosicare this month.
3. Money can’t buy you love. What can $100 million buy you? A 5-point victory in the New York City mayor’s race. How about $130 million? A couple of statewide victories in New Jersey in 2000 and 2005…and then a swift boot out the door in 2009. Bloomberg and Corzine proved that money can’t buy you votes (at least not enough for comfortable victories). Christie won in New Jersey despite being outspent by a 3-1 margin. Bloomberg was well ahead in the polls, running against a relative unknown, and outspent his opponent by gazillions of dollars. He still only won by 5. It’s still the mother’s milk of politics, but money sure isn’t everything anymore.
4. Online advocacy really does work. If money’s influence is diminishing — at least in comparison with other factors — which tools are gaining in influence? Answer: the Internet. There’s a nice write-up on Bob McDonnell’s online advocacy effort — with further links and case studies on e-advocacy — at epolitics.com.
5. What a mess in NY-23. Finally, I can’t ignore the results of the special election in New York’s 23rd Congressional District. Here are my thoughts:

• We have to acknowledge Obama’s brilliant strategy of picking off Republicans in blue states and battleground districts. How many does this make so far? What’s next, Chris Christie for Ambassador? Let’s hope not!
• “A house divided…” The local GOP leaders in upstate New York completely botched the whole process.  This is why the Republican Party should hold primaries. Republican leaders didn’t make it any better after the fact, trading endorsements and jabs that were more about 2012 than NY-23.
• Liberal “Republicans” posing as moderates cannot win. Period. End of story. I believe the GOP can still be a “Big Tent Party,” but that does not mean the tent should include candidates who support gay marriage, abortion rights, more government spending, and higher taxes. There’s already a party for candidates with those views. I’m willing to accept social moderates (rather, social libertarians), but I’m done with big government, big spending LIBERAL Republicans. And I think the Tea Party movement and the American people are done with them too.
• The real story of this race should be that a Conservative Party candidate captured 45 percent of the vote (the highest ever for the party). If Doug Hoffman had had an “R” beside his name, he clearly would have won. And let me also point out that Hoffman doesn’t exactly set the world on fire. I respect anyone willing to stick his neck out in a race like this — and I certainly agree with Hoffman’s politics — but passion, organization, and a grasp for local issues matter too.
• Finally, I hope the Democrats enjoy holding that seat for the next 12 months, because it’s turning red again in 2010.

Agree? Disagree? I’d love to hear your take-aways from Election Day 2009…

The people of North Carolina have spoken.  And they are not happy with the state government’s handling of the economy. 7,672 North Carolinians responded to the “Concerned Citizens Survey”: 87 percent of the respondents vote in every election, another 11 percent vote in most elections. (Politicians, do we have your attention now?) Could this widespread populist anger spell trouble for Democrats in the state in 2010?

Here are some survey highlights:

(more…)

Joe Garecht wrote a fantastic blog entry titled “The 3 Keys to Winning Any Local Election” on his Local Victory website.  If you’re thinking about running for local office — from school board to city council to mayor — read this before you do anything else:

(more…)

Colin Delany wrapped up his series, How Candidates Can Use the Internet to Win in 2010, on his fantastic website, e.politics.  (If you missed the first two posts in the series, you can catch up here and here.) In this third and final installment, Colin writes about online voter outreach and the tools of the trade (social networking platforms, blogs, online video, Internet advertising, and turning volunteers loose on behalf of the campaign).

(more…)

Last week I re-posted a blog entry from Colin Delany’s blog, e.politics, on“How Candidates Can Use the Internet to Win 2010″. Today, in Part Two of his article, Delany covers the basic tools  needed for political campaign Internet strategies, from the campaign website to CRM to budgeting and staffing:

(more…)